Synchronization of estrus in ewes from the Synthetic bulgarian dairy population by progestagen and different follow-up treatments
Nikola Metodiev
Abstract: The aim of the present study was to induce estrus synchronization in ewes after administration of progestagen for 12 days and various subsequent treatments (with FFA, GnRH analogue or no treatment) after cessation of its action. The experiment was conducted in August, 2022, with 27 sheep from the Synthetic Bulgarian Dairy Population. All ewes were treated with vaginal sponges, containing 30 mg FGA (duration of stay - 12 days) and the formation of experimental groups was according to follow-up treatment after sponge removal: I group - experimental animals were treated with 400 UI of PMSG at the time of removal of sponges. II group - the sheep were treated with 1 ml of GnRH analogue, containing busorelin acetate 0.004 mg/ml, 24 hours after sponge removal. III group – no treatment after sponge removal. The next parameters were studied: estrus synchronization rate, fertility and fecundity were studied.
The estrus synchronization rate was the highest for I group - 100% and the lowest for II group - 66.67%. Fertility was highest in III group - 87.50%, and lowest in II group - 50.0%. Fecundity was highest in I group - 171.43%, while in other groups it was 133.33% and 128.57%, respectively, for II group and III group. Based on the obtained results, it could be concluded that GnRH analogue treatment, given solely 24 hours after sponge removal, didn’t have the synchronization effect as the classical follow- up treatment with PMSG. No follow-up treatment after sponge removal was better alternative that GnRH treatment.
Keywords: estrus; GnRH; PMSG; progestogen; sheep
Citation: Metodiev, N. (2023). Synchronization of estrus in ewes from the synthetic bulgarian dairy population by progestagen and different follow-up treatments. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 60(6), 19-24 (Bg).
References: (click to open/close) | Abecia, J. A., Forcada, F. & Gonzáles-Bulnes, A. (2011). Pharmaceutical control of reproduction in sheep and goats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 27(1), 67-79. Dankó, G. (2003). Some Practical and Biotechnological Methods for Improving Reproduction Traits in Sheep. www.date.hu/ acta-agraria/2003-11/novotnine.pdf. Gonzalez-Bulnes, A., Menchaca, A. , Martin, G. & Martinez-Ros, P. (2020). Seventy years of progestagen treatments for management of the sheep oestrous cycle: Where we are and where we should go. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 32, 441–445. Luther, J. S., Grazul-Bilska, A. T., Kirsch, J. D., Weigl, R. M., Kraft, K. C. Navanukraw, C., Pant, D., Reynolds, L. P. & Redmer, D. A. (2007). The effect of GnRH, eCG and progestin type on estrous synchronization following laparoscopic AI in ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 72, 227–231. Martinez-Ros, P., Rios-Abellan, A. & Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. (2019). Influence of Progesterone –Treatment Length and eCG Admistration on Appearance of Estrous Behavior, Ovulatory Success and Fertility in Sheep. Animals, 9(1), 1-9. Martinez-Ros, P. & Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. (2019). Efficiency of CIDR-Based Protocols Including GnRH Instead of eCG for Estrus Synchronization in Sheep. Animals, 9(4), 146. Menchaca, A .& Rubianes, E. (2004). New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 16, 403-413. Robinson, T. J. (1956). The artificial insemination of the Merino sheep following the synchronization of oestrus and ovulation by progesterone injected alone and with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 194-210. Santos-Jimenez, Z., Martinez – Herrero, C., Encinas, T., Martinez –Ros, P. & Gonzalez – Bulnes, A. (2020). Comparative efficiency of oestrus synchronization in sheep with progesterone/eCG and progesterone/GnRH during breeding and non-breeding season. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 55(7), 882-884. Wildeus S., (2000). Current concepts in synchronization of oestrus: sheep and goats. Journal of Animal Science, 77( Issue suppl_E), 1–14.
|
|
| Date published: 2023-12-21
Download full text