Comparative study on the morphological traits and hatchability of egg from dual purpose and laying purebred lines and crosses
Evgeni Petkov, Maya Ignatova
, Krasimir Dimov, Teodora Popova
Резюме: During the recent decades, the scientific community turned its attention towards the dual purpose lines and crosses that might offer a suitable solution for two problems in poultry breeding - the use of male chickens for meat and the use of female chickens for rearing in alternative types of systems for egg production. Hence, a study with four groups of birds: a dual purpose cross "Salmon", a dual purpose purebred line "BB", a laying line "L" and a laying hybrid line "ISA-Brown" was conducted. The aim was to compare the morphological traits, as well as the fertility and the hatchability of the eggs, obtained from "ISA-Brown", compared to the dual purpose "Salmon" reared at IAS-Kostinbrod, and the local dual purpose and laying lines involved in its creation.
As a result of the conducted research, we can conclude that the selection for high performance, larger eggs and the presence of heterosis in hybrids has to some extent a positive influence on most of the morphological traits determining the quality of the eggs produced. In addition, negative consequences for their hatchability, embryo survival and some morphological parameters such as increased width of the egg and increased diameter of the yolk were also observed. On the other hand, in the stock hybrids, compared to the purebred lines and the dual purpose crosses, this can also be considered as a sign of deterioration of the nutritional quality of the eggs.
Ключови думи: dual purpose hens; hatchability of eggs; layers; laying hybrid; morphological traits of eggs
Цитиране: Petkov, E., Ignatova, M., Dimov, K. & Popova, T. (2024). Comparative study on the morphological traits and hatchability of egg from dual purpose and laying purebred lines and crosses. Bulgarian Journal of Animal Husbandry, 61(5), 39-51 (Bg).
| Литература: (click to open/close) | Anene, D. O., Akter, Y., Thomson, P. C., Groves, P. & O'Shea, C. J. (2020). Variation and Association of Hen Performance and Egg Quality Traits in Individual Early-Laying ISA Brown Hens Animals. Basel, 10(9), 1601. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1601.
Buzała, M., Janicki, B. & Czarnecki, R. (2015). Consequences of different growth rates in broiler breeder and layer hens on embryogenesis, metabolism and metabolic rate: A review. Poult Sci, 94(4), 728-733.
Carvalho, F. B., Stringhini, J. H. & Jardim Filho, R. M. (2003). Influência da conservação e do período de armazenamento sobre a qualidade interna e da casca de ovos comerciais. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 5, 100. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbspa/a/Vd3rxQHWFFdkmLfqywwr8cQ/?lang=pt&format=pdf.
Cywa-Benko, K., Krawczyk, J. & Wężyk, S. (2003). Quality of table eggs from hens of native breeds. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech, 30(2), 405–413.
Czaja, L. & Gornowicz, E. (2006). Effect of genome and hen’s age on table egg quality. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., 33(1), 59–70.
Damme, K., Urselmans, S. & Schmidt, E. (2015). Economics of dual-purpose breeds - A comparison of meat and egg production using dual purpose breeds versus conventional broiler and layer strains. Lohmann Inf., 50, 4 - 9.
Dannica, C., Ramon, W., Malheiros, D., Anderson, K. E. & Anthony, N. (2024). Comparing performance, morphological, physical, and chemical properties of eggs produced by 1940 Leghorn or a commercial 2016 Leghorn fed representative diets from 1940 or 2016. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 100463. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617124000618.
De Ketelaere, B., Govaerts, T., Coucke, P., Dewil, E., Visscher, J., Decuypere, E. & De Baerdemaeker, J. (2002). Measuring the eggshell strength of 6 different genetic strains of laying hens: Techniques and comparisons. British Poultry Science, 43(2), 238-244.
Dudek, M. & Rabsztyn, A. (2011). Egg duality of dual purpose hens intended for small-scale farming. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica, 10(1), 3–12.
Dzungwe, J. T., Tozo, K., Chrysostome, C. A. A. M., Tankouano, R. A., Oke, O. E. & Tona, K. (2024). Effect of crossbreeding on egg quality, incubation, and hatching activities of the pure and reciprocal cross between the Sasso and Wassache chickens. Poultry Science, 103(4), 103406. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579123009264.
Heflin, L., Malheiros, R., Anderson, K., Johnson, L. & Raatz, S. (2018). Mineral content of eggs differs with hen strain, age, and rearing environment. Poult Sci.,97(5), 1605-1613.
Johnston, S. A. & Gous, R. M. (2007). Modelling the changes in the proportions of the egg components during a laying cycle. Br. Poult. Sci., 48(3), 347-353.
Khawaja, T., Khan, S. H., Mukhtar, N., Ali, M. A., Ahmed, T. & Ghafar, A. (2012). Comparative study of growth performance, egg production, egg characteristics and haemato-biochemical parameters of Desi, Fayoumi and Rhode Island Red chicken. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 40, 273-283.
Koenig, M., Hahn, G., Damme, K. & Schmutz, M. (2010). Utilization of laying-type cockerels as coquelets: Growth performance and carcass quality. Fleischwirtschaft, 90, 92–94.
Koenig, M., Hahn, G., Damme, K. & Schmutz, M. (2012). Utilization of laying-type cockerels as “coquelets”: Influence of genotype and diet characteristics on growth performance and carcass composition. Arch. Geflugelkd, 76, 197–202.
Krawczyk, J. (2009). Quality of eggs from Polish native Greenleg Partridge chicken-hens maintained in organic vs. back yard production systems. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 27(3), 227–235.
Küçükyılmaz, K., Bozkurt, M., Herken, E. N., Cınar, M., Catlı, A. U., Bintaş, E. & Cöven, F. (2012). Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 25(4), 559-568.
Kumar, D., Raginski, C., Schwean-Lardner, K. & Classen, H. L. (2018). Assessing the response of hen weight, body composition, feather score, egg quality, and level of excreta nitrogen content to digestible balanced protein intake of laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 98(4), 619-630.
Lambertz, C., Wuthijaree, K. & Gauly, M. (2018). Performance, behavior, and health of male broilers and laying hens of 2 dual-purpose chicken genotypes. Poult. Sci., 97, 3564 - 3576.
Michalak, K. & Mróz, E. (2003). Egg albumen quality. Pol. Drobiar., 4, 9–10.
Mishra, B., Sah, N. & Wasti, S. (2019). Genetic and Hormonal Regulation of Egg Formation in the Oviduct of Laying Hens. Ed.Poultry - An Advanced Learning. IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85011.
Mueller, S., Kreuzer, M., Siegrist, M., Mannale, K., Messikommer, R. E. & Gangnat, I. D. M. (2018). Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types. Poult. Sci., 97, 3325–3336.
Nolte, T., Jansen, S., Weigend, S., Moerlein, D., Halle, I., Simianer, H. & Sharifi, A. R. (2021). Genotypic and dietary effects on egg quality of local chicken breeds and their crosses fed with Faba beans. Animals, 11, 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071947.
Ohl, F. & van der Staay, F.J. (2012). Animal welfare: At the interface between science and society. Vet. J., 192, 13–19.
Omotara, O. P., Abioja, M. O., Iyasere, O. S. & Egbeyale, L. T. (2020). Comparative egg production, quality and hatchability in three chicken genotypes under humid tropical conditions. J. Agric. Res. Dev., 19, 38–52.
Rakonjac, S., Dosković, V., Bošković, S. B., Škrbić, Z., Lukić, M., Petričević, V. & Petrović, D. M. (2021). Production performance and egg quality of laying hens as influenced by genotype and rearing system. Brazil. J. Poult. Sci., 23(2), 1–8.
Reithmayer, C., Mußhoff, O. & Danne, M. (2019). Alternatives to culling male chicks—The consumer perspective. British Food Journal, 122, 753–765.
Silversides, F. & Budgell, K. (2004). The Relationships Among Measures of Egg Albumen Height, pH, and Whipping Volume. Poultry science, 83, 1619-1623.
Sokołowicz, Z. & Krawczyk J. (2004). Quality of table eggs from hens in the first and second year of production. Rocz. Nauk. Zootech., 31(2), 243–249.
Tiemann, I., Hillemacher, S. & Wittmann, M. (2020). Are Dual-Purpose Chickens Twice as Good? Measuring Performance and Animal Welfare throughout the Fattening Period. Animals, 10(11), doi: 10.3390/ani10111980.
Tixier-Boichard, M., Bordas, A. & Rognon, X. (2009). Characterisation and monitoring of poultry genetic resources. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 65, 272–285.
Trziszka, T. (2000). Egg: science, technology and practice, Wrocław.
Washburn, K. W. (1990). Genetic variation in egg composition. (in: Poultry Breeding and Genetics). Crawford R.D. (Ed.), Elsevier Science Publisher, B V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 781–798.
Williams, K. (1992). Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World's Poultry Science Journal, 48(1), 5-16.
|
|
| Дата на публикуване: 2024-10-24
Свали пълен текст 
